Include yourself in the "should"?

• It developed when we were talking about should not do.
• Whether “must” is used for “a set that includes you” or not
  • Example

    • The case of the uncle who says, “Women should wear makeup.”

    • A case of a woman in full make-up saying, “Women should wear make-up.

      • I make up” first, and then an explanation of the motive for doing so.

    • If a person who says “all people should continue to learn” does not learn inconsistency between one’s words and actions.

      • People who say “should” to subjects that don’t include them are shirking their responsibility to act.
      • Like you’re hitting people from a safe zone?
      • “A student’s true duty is to study!” The uncle who insists

    • Poor people who insist that “rich people should donate more.”

      • The rich person who argues that “rich people should donate more” and then donates himself will be like, “I see, carrying out one’s words you’re doing that.”

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「べき」の対象に自分を含むか using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.